Monday, September 26, 2005

have you seen www.protectyourvote.org? Stop RON now!

This is posted from the website

http://protectyourvote.org

It is in regards to Reform Ohio Now and the reasons to vote NO on issues 2, 3, 4, &5. Please visit their website and check out the issues!

Also if you are interested in volunteering please contact Don at trivisonno@young-republican.com. We desperately need people to help make phone calls to Lake County Republicans!
Thanks in advance for your support!

<<<<< Begin transcript from protectyourvote.org >>>>>

Why Vote NO?

Argument Against Issue 2
First, the adoption of this amendment is likely to lead to a significant increase in cases of fraudulent voting in Ohio, as experienced in other states that have adopted similar proposals. The proposed amendment does not contain a reliable method to protect the integrity of votes cast early, nor does it provide adequate safeguards to ensure that only eligible and qualified voters would be able to use these procedures.

Second, this amendment is not necessary because Ohio law already contains generous absentee voting provisions. Currently, any Ohio voter with a legitimate reason for being absent on Election Day can obtain an absentee ballot. In fact, there are 16 reasons that allow absentee voting under current Ohio law, including: military service; health and physical disability issues; work related issues; being age 62 or older; or, simply that the voter expects to be absent from the county on Election Day for personal reasons.

Third, the proposed amendment does not ensure that every Ohioan will have the same opportunity to vote early. The amendment does not establish a statewide standard that must be followed for designation of times and locations for early voting. The rules governing early voting could vary widely from county to county, because the amendment gives each county Board of Elections the discretion to designate the times and locations for early voting.

Argument Against Issue 3

The proposed amendment would change how Ohio political campaigns are funded to benefit the wealthy and labor unions, to the disadvantage of all other Ohioans.

The proposed amendment allows labor unions to funnel unlimited amounts of money into the political process through a new type of political organization that is deceptively labeled a “small donor” action committee. In addition, there would be no obligation placed on labor unions to provide full disclosure regarding the source of this money, that could even be given by non-Ohio sources.

The proposed amendment would give an unfair advantage to wealthy candidates because they would be permitted to use unlimited amounts of personal money in their campaigns. However, unlike Ohio’s current law, the proposed amendment would not permit an individual running against a wealthy opponent to raise additional campaign dollars to make the election competitive.

The proposed amendment would also place drastic restrictions on the ability of all other Ohioans to raise money to combat the undue influence of the wealthy and labor unions in Ohio elections. These restrictions are designed to silence the voices of ordinary Ohioans in the elections process.

Argument Against Issue 4

First, the amendment would remove from the control of Ohio voters the power to establish districts for the Ohio General Assembly and the U.S. Congress, by abolishing the role of elected public officials in these important tasks. The proposed amendment would place this power in the hands of a new commission that is made up of 5 political appointees. Two of the commission members would be selected by judges and the others may be chosen by lot. The members of the commission would not be required to meet any minimum level of qualifications. Once appointed, the commissioners would serve for an indefinite period of time, and would never be accountable to Ohio voters.

Second, the proposed amendment would grant the commission virtually unlimited power to spend Ohio tax dollars, with essentially no control by Ohio voters or other state leaders. No other state commission has this extraordinary spending power.

Third, the proposed amendment would remove the current protection in the Ohio constitution that prevents the dilution of your vote. The proposed amendment would also delete from the Ohio Constitution the provisions designed to prevent “gerrymandering,” and would permit the creation of legislative districts that break up communities and neighborhoods.

Finally, the proposed amendment would remove from the Ohio Constitution the authority of Ohio’s courts to review the commission’s activities. Therefore, unlike all other Ohio public officials, political subdivisions, boards, commissions, and agencies, Ohio citizens would have virtually no ability to challenge the actions of this elected commission in Ohio’s courts. The commission should not be uniquely unaccountable and placed above the law.

Argument Against Issue 5

First, the proposed amendment would effectively end the local control over Ohio elections that is currently exercised by our bipartisan county elections boards.

Second, the proposed amendment would create a new statewide elections board that would consist of members who are politically appointed for 9-year terms, and would never be accountable to Ohio voters.

Third, the proposed amendment would eliminate the role of Ohio’s Secretary of State in Ohio’s election system. The new statewide board of political appointees would replace our elected Secretary of State. The proponents of this amendment clearly distrust the ability of Ohio voters to choose a public official to be in charge of Ohio’s election system.

Fourth, the proposed amendment would essentially give the appointed elections board a “blank check” to spend any and all tax dollars that it desires. The proposed amendment does not explain why it is necessary to give this group of political appointees the power to spend unlimited amounts of tax dollars, without being accountable to Ohio voters or elected Ohio public officials.



Paid for by Ohio First Voter Education Fund. J. Matthew Yuskewich, Treasurer. 88 East Broad, Suite 1320 . Columbus , OH 43215 .

10 comments:

ohio06win said...

I think you are wrong in your opposition to Issues 2,3,4, & 5. The GOP controls everything in this state and they are NOT doing a good job at it. Why are you against fair elections? Instead of opposing issues that would improve the Ohio government, perhaps you should use your energy to clean up the corruption of the Ohio GOP (coingate, golfgate, Bob Ney, etc.). Have a nice day! Vote for Issues 2,3,4,&5 for a better Ohio.

Anonymous said...

Hey stubborn liberal, the elections are fair if you believe in one person one vote! By fair I assume you are referring to the original Mayor Daley's method in Chicago. And by the way...have you forgotten zippergate?

Anonymous said...

The main problem I have with the reform issues is the fact that it does not allow for our election system to grow beyond the two old warhorse parties. Look at the actual wording of the issues. It specifically states that the 'independent' election council will be made up of members of the governor's party and of the opposing party. One position out of the nine has the POSSIBILITY of not being from either of the two parties.

As an Independent voter, who has voted for both Dem's and Rep's in the past, I am deeply concerned that we Ohioans would constitutionalize a two party system and leave out all other choices, including non-partisans.

Anonymous said...

Lake GOP, please talk about reality. People were prevented from voting in 2000 and 2004 and more times we don't even know about. The Bureau of Workers' Comp. lost over 18million dollars in coingate. Clinton may have screwed around with one intern, but the GOP has screwed the country over the last few years. The director of the Franklin Co. Bd. of Elections Damschroder took a bribe from Diebold http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjournal/12150159.htm
How much money has the Kokosing family donated to the Ohio GOP and Taft? Do you think that has to do with the fact that they get all the state contracts? How about Bob Ney and his association with indicted Tom DeLay? This country and this state need a good cleaning and the first place to start is elections. Thanks for listening.

Anonymous said...

The Stealth Campaign
If you had any questions about the true motivations behind the so-called "Reform Ohio Now" campaign (State Issues 2, 3, 4 and 5), look no further than this blog post by Rep. John Conyers (D-Michigan):

“Victory in these measures will lend momentum nationally, will provide Democrats up to 6 six new Congressional seats in the 2006 elections, and could help restore a Democratic majority to Congress. As many have noted, this is the most important election of the year.”

This from the guy who used Ohio's 2004 presidential election to grandstand on unfounded allegations of "massive and unprecedented voter irregularities and anomalies... caused by intentional misconduct and illegal behavior, much of it involving Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell..." (Conyers Report)

Those claims have already been debunked by the media, and Conyers has been accused by fellow Democrat Bill Anthony, chair of the Franklin County board of elections and the Franklin County Democratic Party, of heading a "band of conspiracy theorists." (The Columbus Dispatch, 12/9/04) Now he's lobbying for State Issues 2, 3, 4 and 5. That should tell you everything you need to know about this stealth campaign to manipulate Ohio's elections.

Don't be fooled by the rhetoric. These issues are NOT about making Ohio's elections more "competitive." They're about a Democratic takeover, plain and simple.

Vote NO on State Issues 2, 3, 4 and 5.

http://ohiogop.blogs.com/state_of_the_union/

Anonymous said...

FYI

"Those claims have already been debunked by the media".

Who is the media to debunk any claims? The media is a corporation like any other and will protect its own interests at all costs.


The Commission on Federal Election Reform supported claims that there was abuse and fraud in the 2004 elections. You can find a copy of their reform recommendations here. Follow the links

http://www.american.edu/ia/cfer/

Anonymous said...

Crybaby Libs...The GOP controls everything in this state because the Dems have shown, time and again, that they can't be trusted. Just take a look at the condition of the City of Cleveland to see the effect that democratic leadership can deliver. Great job gang...let's keep it up. :)

Do we want to talk about scandal? How about MDL and its connection to George & Mimi Forbes? That was what - to the tune of $215 mil? Sure buys a lot of beanie-babies.

RON is just another Dem smokescreen...and it serves a great lesson. When you can't win...just cheat. And when you STILL can't win - call the other guy a cheater.
AND...when you still can't win after that, file frivolous lawsuits and bomb our elections offices with unfulfillable requests at the taxpayers expense to try and tie up the system to gridlock.

Anonymous said...

Unfortunately, the Republicans have only learned the lesson of "We're not nearly as bad as the Dems of old, look at the Clinton administration's scandals." The fact is that the current administration is not doing much for the American people. the current Taft clique has screwed the state so far into the ground that not even a cheap $2 hooker would touch it.

Instead of pointing fingers at each other to see who points out the worst scandal of the other party, how about we finally move on becoming a good state that takes care of its people and keeps some of the talent that was born and educated here.

I don't see either party working ont that problem to a sufficient degree.

Anonymous said...

THANKS TO THE STEALTH CAMPAIGN FOR MAKING UP MY MIND ON THE ISSUES OF 2,3,4,AND 5. IWAS UNDECIDED BUT HE HELPED ME TO DECIDE TO VOTE YES FOR THE ISSUES.

THANKS

Anonymous said...

I have been following a site now for almost 2 years and I have found it to be both reliable and profitable. They post daily and their stock trades have been beating
the indexes easily.

Take a look at Wallstreetwinnersonline.com

RickJ